Giant Sport Scale
53.1 Sport Scale Competition comprises three events open to
any model rocket that closely resembles an existing or historical guided
missile, rocket vehicle, or space vehicle. The purpose of this
competition is to produce a flying replica of a real rocket vehicle,
that exhibits maximum craftsmanship in construction, finish, and flight
performance. Sport Scale Competition differs from Scale Competition
(Rule 50) in that the dimensions of the model are not directly measured.
53.2 Classes
The following classes of Sport Scale shall exist:
Any size model may be entered.
The model must be at least 100 centimeters in overall length
or at least 10 centimeters in body diameter. Vehicles with significant
outer assemblies or winged vehicles qualify if their length plus
wingspan totals at least 100 centimeters or if their girth (as measured
once around in a plane perpendicular to the centerline of the model by a
length of string around the components not including the fins or wings)
totals at least 31.4 centimeters.
- 53.2.3 Peanut Sport Scale
The model must be no more than 30 centimeters in overall
length or no more than 2 centimeters in body diameter. When judging this
class, the increased difficulty of building a very small model should
be considered.
53.3 Sport Scale models of amateur rockets or missiles are
specifically excluded from this competition, except when the prototype
is of obvious historical significance.
53.4 Entries in Sport Scale Competition may model nonflying or inert prototypes.
53.5 Entries that qualify for Plastic Model Conversion
Competition under Rule 55 are specifically excluded from this event.
Parts from commercial plastic kits may be used on Sport Scale models,
provided this is pointed out in the data presented with the model for
judging.
53.6 The contestant must supply data to substantiate his/her model's adherence to scale in shape, color, and paint pattern.
53.7 If the prototype is a multi-staged vehicle, the scale
model may be designed so that some or all of the upper stages are
inoperable dummies. However, a scale model of only the upper stages of a
multi-staged vehicle may not be entered without the operable lower
stage(s) unless specific data is furnished to prove to the judges that
the upper stage configuration has flown separately, alone, and as a
vehicle itself.
53.8 If the prototype is not stabilized by means of fins, or
if the scaled fins are not of sufficient size to ensure the stable
flight of the model, the scale model may be fitted with transparent
plastic fins to make it stable in flight. However, the transparent fins
and their attachment shall be judged for craftsmanship along with the
model.
53.9 Models shall be judged for static points in the following
manner: Scale-like qualities are to be judged from a distance of at
least one meter from the model. Judges may then closely examine the
model to judge it for craftsmanship.
53.10 Details that are not visible during judging (e.g., dummy
engines, hidden interior assemblies) shall not be considered in scoring
the entry.
53.11 Each entry shall make a safe, stable flight. If the. entry does not make a safe, stable flight, it shall be disqualified.
53.12 Static points shall be awarded according to the following schedule:
- 53.12.1 Similarity of Outline: 200 points.
The contestant is required to submit data to substantiate
his/her model's visual resemblance to the prototype. Minimum allowable
data consists of:
(a) A line, tone, or color drawing; or
(b) One or more clear photographs, halftones, or
photo-reproductions of the prototype, sufficient to show the outline and
general configuration of the prototype modeled.
Any entry not accompanied by the minimum allowable data as
listed above shall be disqualified. The Judges may disqualify any entry
which, in their opinion, is accompanied by substantiation data of such
poor quality as to fail to convey a satisfactory impression of the
outline and general configuration of the prototype.
- 53.12.2 Finish, Color, and Markings: 200 points.
The contestant should submit data to substantiate his/her model's fidelity to the prototype. Suggested options include:
(a) One or more clear photographs, halftones, or
photo-reproductions; including at least one in color. The number of
these submitted should be sufficient to substantiate additional views of
the model on which the color pattern and markings differ
significantly.
(b) Other published pictorial representations, such as a color painting, or a drawing from a magazine.
(c) A detailed written description, from a reliable source,
of the color scheme and markings; accompanied by a drawing of the
prototype on which the color scheme and markings described have been
included. This drawing may be neatly made by the modeler.
Any entry not accompanied by data substantiating the finish, color, and
markings of the prototype shall be given zero points for Finish, Color
and Markings; but shall not be disqualified from the competition.
- 53.12.3 Degree of Difficulty: 100 points.
Points shall be awarded according to the difficulty
experienced by the modeler in building the model and adapting it for
flight. Minor consideration should be given to whether the model was
built from scratch or a kit. Points should be awarded for parts and
details that were individually constructed by the modeler. (To
facilitate judging, the contestant should point out difficult assemblies
or construction problems in his/her substantiation data packet.)
- 53.12.4 Craftsmanship: 300 points.
Points will be awarded for neatness, care in construction,
craftsmanship of visible details, and quality of finish. Consideration
should be given to the invisibility of body seams and wood grain, the
proper curving of curved lines, and edges made properly sharp or rounded
as visible from the substantiating data. The finish should be free of
fingerprints, brush strokes, runs, or other unintentional blemishes; and
the paint pattern should be well-defined. The details should be
precise, and neither more nor less obvious than on the prototype.
53.13 Flight Characteristics: 300 points
300 flight points shall be awarded according to the following schedule:
- 53.13.1 Mission: 200 points.
Mission points are awarded for appropriate and scale-like
operation of the model during flight. Examples of such operations are
staging, simulated cloud seeding, operation of electronic payload, and
smoke ejection. Any such operation must comply fully with the safety
standards set forth in this NAR Sporting Code. If it does not, the entry
shall be disqualified. The RSO is the only official who may judge the
safety qualities of the operation.
- 53.13.2 General Flight: 100 points.
General Flight points are awarded for proper operation of
the model during flight, including launch, lack of misfires, stability,
recovery, and lack of damage on landing. No consideration should be
given to staging or scale-like flight characteristics, as these are
covered under Mission points; however, if the general flight performance
of the model is adversely affected by the ailure of one or more of
these aspects, points may be deducted from General Flight.
53.14 Sport Scale Competition shall be scored as follows: the
points awarded to the entry in static judging shall be added to the
points awarded to the entry in flight. The contestant receiving the
highest score is the winner.
Weighting Factor 20